

Angela M. Caulley - Miller Johnson
Angela Caulley attended Michigan State University College of Law (formerly known as Michigan State College of Law), where she earned her J.D. summa cum laude in 2017. During her time there, she was a Dean Charles H. King Scholar, served on the Michigan State Law Review as Senior Symposia Editor, and participated in moot court competitions, including as an ABA Regional Champion in 2016. She now practices as an attorney in the probate and estate planning group at Miller Johnson in Grand Rapids and Kalamazoo, Michigan
This picture of Angela is courtesy of LinkedIn. In our opinion, Ms. Caulley looks like an AI mail-order doll. Her cheeks look like she went a bit too heavy on the airbrush rouge or perhaps it is symptomatic of an alcoholic? She's actually a very attractive human.
Caulley is experienced and trained in Michigan's Rules of Professional Conduct, Michigan's Court Rules, and significantly, Michigan's Estates and Protected Individuals Code. Once you know the law, it's like riding a bike. You don't forget the law. But documents demonstrate that Caulley mislead the court over and over.
Ms. Caulley knowingly:
1. Represented multiple competing interests. MRPC 1.7 and 1.8.
2. Concealed material information in the administration of the William H. Johnson Jr. Living Trust and the Ralph A. Siddell Living Trust that was prejudicial to the fair administration of justice. MCR 9.104(1)
3. Omitted MCL 700.7303(d) and MCL 700.1403(b)(ii)(D) constituting the omission of controlling legal authority in pleadings transmitted via U.S. Mail, email and Michigan's True-Filing System. MRPC 3.3
4. Made material misrepresentations of fact and law to the court concerning the construction and application of MCL 700.7604(1)(b) by omitting controlling legal authority - MCL 700.1102, MCL 700.7103(n), and MCL 700.1107(k) and (n) as part of a scheme to defraud the elderly and charitable beneficiaries to abuse and financially exploit them, as well as exploitation of charitable organizations.
MCR 9.104(1) through (5).
Her conduct leaves one wondering, does Michigan State College of Law have a problem on how to violate every ethics rule and advanced cheating 101?
The documents in 20-62158-CZ, 21-62791-TV, 21-62806-TV and 21-62888-TV demonstrate that Caulley was dishonest. Due to the harm she inflicted, in our opinion, she has a soul and heart as black as coal. Her parents must be very proud.


Michigan's attorneys and judges are the best at dishonesty and deception.
All files will be uploaded here for you to be the judge: The Michigan Probate Mafia
A trustee may retain an attorney to assist in the administration of a trust on behalf of the trust beneficiaries. MCL 700.7817(w). Michigan law does not allow a trustee to retain an attorney to use the U.S. Mail, email, or Michigan's True-Filing System to aid and abet breach of fiduciary duty, engage in fraud, deception, concealment, perjury, false pretenses, omission of controlling legal authority, misrepresentation to evade the detection of conversion, embezzlement, and money laundering to evade paying taxes.
Here are Michigan's Rules of Professional Conduct. Let's briefly go over the relevant Rules and how they were violated and we'll let you be the judge:
MRPC 3.3 requires a lawyer to demonstrate candor toward a tribunal, prohibits a lawyer from making false statements of material fact or law, permits a lawyer to refuse to offer evidence that the lawyer reasonably believes to be false, and requires a lawyer to inform the tribunal of all material facts. Good faith in dealing with a tribunal is mandated.
Rule 4.1. Truthfulness in Statements to Others. In the course of representing a client, a lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person.
Misrepresentation. A lawyer is required to be truthful when dealing with others on a client’s behalf, but generally has no affirmative duty to inform an opposing party of relevant facts. A misrepresentation can occur if the lawyer incorporates or affirms a statement of another person that the lawyer knows is false.
